| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: EOL for 7.4? |
| Date: | 2009-11-03 16:37:29 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10911030837o698ea24fgfb5f4f4114da5bc7@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Unless there are unfixable data loss bugs in it, I say we keep it.
>
> Many people still run it, so why make them move?
There are non-trivial amounts of effort required to produce and test
packages for each branch we maintain. That affects all of the
packagers to varying degrees and should not be overlooked.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-11-03 16:39:10 | Re: A small bug in gram.y |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-11-03 16:35:41 | Re: EOL for 7.4? |