From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Client application name |
Date: | 2009-10-15 15:25:32 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10910150825h27e84a7ds5cb8d31664ed719d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Also, I am wondering exactly what you think psql would *do* with the
>>> parameter if it had it. If the answer is "force the setting to be
>>> 'psql'", that's the wrong answer. IMO you'd really want the environment
>>> variable to take precedence over that, if set. But libpq considers the
>>> priority to go the other way.
>
>> Well in the psql case, it could flip that priority itself and only set
>> the value if the environment variable wasn't set - which I agree would
>> seem the right thing to do. On further thought, it would seem
>> reasonable to do the same in the other apps as well, so you could have
>> your backup script do something like "PGAPPLICATIONNAME="Nightly
>> backup" /usr/bin/pg_dump ..."
>
> Hmm. Maybe this is a generic problem. Should libpq offer some sort
> of help? Maybe a "secondaryappname" parameter that doesn't override
> the env variable.
is it worth uglifying libpq? All we're talking about is something like:
if (!getenv("PGAPPLICATIONNAME"))
strncat(connstr, " application_name=psql", sizeof(connstr) -
strlen(connstr) - 1);
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-10-15 15:34:51 | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-15 15:06:23 | Re: EXPLAIN BUFFERS |