From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Client application name |
Date: | 2009-10-15 13:56:34 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10910150656gc8574edj6b24247861089e45@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Sure. I'm envisioning that what the env variable or connection option
> actually does is cause libpq to include a SET command for a GUC
> variable in the initial connection request packet. Compare, say,
> PGCLIENTENCODING -> client_encoding.
So you can now do any of the following to set the application name:
- Set $PGAPPLICATIONNAME on the client, prior to connection.
- Include 'application_name=MyCoolApp' in the PQconnectdb connection string.
- Use SET application_name
Currently though, pg_dump and psql (and presumably their close
friends) use PQsetdbLogin to establish their connection. Would it be
preferred if I:
a) Added PQsetdbLogin2() with an additional option for the application
name (my guess is 'no').
b) Updated the apps to use PQconnectdb
c) Something else?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-10-15 14:08:32 | Re: Rejecting weak passwords |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-10-15 13:49:29 | Re: Rejecting weak passwords |