From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Docs build error in alpha1 |
Date: | 2009-09-25 16:05:34 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10909250905y186dc3bbkcf77e1c306c3e6d8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 16:47 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> > I think you have an old version of docbook-xsl.
>>
>> It's the latest available for CentOS 4.6:
>>
>> [buildfarm(at)bf-linux ~]$ rpm -q -a |grep docbook
>> docbook-utils-0.6.14-4
>> docbook-style-xsl-1.65.1-2
>> docbook-style-dsssl-1.78-4
>> docbook-dtds-1.0-25
>>
>> What do I need?
>
> I quick grep through the changelog suggests that docbook-style-xsl
> 1.69.1 or later will get you a lot closer.
Can we detect this and give the user a more helpful error message?
CentOS 4.x (and RHEL 4.x) are older distros certainly, but not exactly
ancient yet.
> Note that the release tarballs contain the built documentation, so maybe
> this isn't really necessary.
It would seem like wasted effort in that case.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-25 16:13:37 | Re: syslog_line_prefix |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-09-25 15:56:12 | Re: Docs build error in alpha1 |