From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | Sergei Abramov <auspex(at)rambler(dot)ru>, pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Malfunction in dropping database with pgAdmin |
Date: | 2009-08-10 19:03:42 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10908101203o7b8defc2l954b6c5cca176318@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Guillaume
Lelarge<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le lundi 10 août 2009 à 15:48:39, Sergei Abramov a écrit :
>> Database dropping INITIATED BY pgAdmin leads to unability for SERVER
>> (not pgAdmin itself, surely!) to purify database folder. Both in Windows
>> XP and Windows 2000, both NTFS- and FAT-filesystems, the latter being
>> used just for experiment. If you don't care about this problem I won't
>> disturb you...
pgAdmin, psql, and dropdb will *all* drop the database by issuing a
DROP DATABASE query via libpq. There is no difference between them,
except possibly the database to which they initially connect. By
default all will use 'postgres'.
Even if there is a difference in database you are using for the
connection, then it is still a server issue, and should be reported to
pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-08-10 20:16:47 | Re: Small annoyance in pgAdmin 1.10 |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-08-10 18:57:09 | Re: Small annoyance in pgAdmin 1.10 |