From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Duplicate Events (and other stuff).. |
Date: | 2009-08-10 18:50:07 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10908101150s374766aey60adf92497762d73@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> FYI, my view is that we should include any training events in which
>> PostgreSQL is a part of the technology stack and will be used directly
>> in some way. It helps show the visitors to our site the diverse range
>> of activities and applications in use around the project. If you see
>> what I mean :-)
>
> Oh. I just bounced a Postgres Plus Advanced Server training submission
> from the website based on the policy. Should I not have done so?
Well for obvious reasons I'd like to say yes, but PPAS != PostgreSQL,
which is what the policy requires the training be related to.
That said - Postgres Plus Standard Server *is* pure PostgreSQL (plus a
bunch of useful add-ons like Slony, PostGIS etc), so I don't think
PPSS training should be bounced, should it be posted.
> What's our stance on training/events/news for forked versions?
I would say no to forks, but yes to alternate distros.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2009-08-10 19:06:52 | Re: Duplicate Events (and other stuff).. |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-08-10 18:38:07 | Re: Duplicate Events (and other stuff).. |