From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Trac tickets |
Date: | 2009-08-07 08:48:41 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10908070148r70aec0f0mb38ddcedcf7d29f3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Guillaume
Lelarge<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le jeudi 6 août 2009 à 13:10:24, Dave Page a écrit :
>> Why are trac tickets being created for the recent change history?
>> That's what the changelog and svn history is for...
>
> Yes. I created them to try to use the roadmap system. See this:
>
> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/roadmap
> and this:
>
> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/query?milestone=1.10.1&order=priority&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&col=component
> (which is kind of a changelog and a todo list)
OK, well if you want to start maintaining this, please have a think
about how we can modify the existing processes to accomodate it. At
the very least, I would like to avoid the changelog duplication - can
we drop that file, or auto-create it for example?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-08-07 11:35:51 | Re: Trac tickets |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-08-06 21:13:18 | Re: Patch to fix Debian Bug #451038 |