From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |
Date: | 2009-07-14 18:17:47 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10907141117v31155203i2465352e02876cdb@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, July 14, 2009, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> > Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
>> >> This patch using VirtualAlloc()/VirtualFree() to avoid failing in
>> >> reattach to shared memory.
>>
>> > Since this fixes a very annoying bug present in older versions, I think
>> > this should be backpatched all the way back to 8.2.
>>
>> Agreed, but first we need some evidence that it actually fixes the
>> problem. How can we acquire such evidence?
>
> Send the patch to the people who has reported trouble and see if it
> seems gone? If somebody is able to build patched Win32 packages I could
> point a couple of guys in the spanish list to them.
I built a version which a guy is currently testing. He could reproduce
the bug easily, but last i heard, the patch was looking good.
Don't have the details here tho.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-07-14 18:18:30 | Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-07-14 18:17:14 | Re: Alpha release process |