From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Prasad, Venkat" <venkat(dot)prasad(at)credit-suisse(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] Integrity check |
Date: | 2009-06-23 13:30:50 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10906230630o5fbea56braaa674015e6241f2@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, David Fetter<david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>> Auditors can be a funny breed.
>
> They can, at that, but in this case, they're simply doing the normal
> human thing of trying to figure out whether there's a way they can
> push off their work to someone or something else. In this case, they
> can't.
Depends what they've been hired to audit exactly - there's a
difference in the way they will attack the IT aspects of a financial
audit versus an IT management audit for example. In my experience, the
former is worse because they are often done by finance people who will
simply box-tick 'verified backups' before reporting to the board or
regulator, unlike an IT auditor who will look at the systems as a
whole and judge the processes based on their technical merit.
Anyway - this is pre-beer conference talk...
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lars Kanis | 2009-06-23 13:47:48 | Re: BUG #4869: No proper initialization of OpenSSL-Engine in libpq |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-06-23 13:26:56 | Re: [BUGS] Integrity check |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | DaNieL..! | 2009-06-23 13:42:21 | Re: Please suggest me on my table design (indexes!) |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-06-23 13:26:56 | Re: [BUGS] Integrity check |