Re: machine-readable explain output

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: machine-readable explain output
Date: 2009-06-14 08:46:03
Message-ID: 937d27e10906140146t168c29ebtfbd3969ed35db8ba@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/13/09, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
>
>
> --On 13. Juni 2009 15:01:43 -0400 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>> Also, the result type of an EXPLAIN (format xml) should be type xml, not
>>> text.
>>
>> Seems reasonable. I'll see if I can figure out how to do that.
>
> I suppose it's okay then, that the format is not available when the server
> isn't build with --with-libxml ?

I hope not, otherwise the usefulness of the format is significantly
reduced (to practically zero) if tools cannot rely on it being
available and have to fall back to something else if it's not
available.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2009-06-14 11:12:39 Re: machine-readable explain output
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2009-06-14 07:35:33 Re: postgresql regular expr bug?