From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: News moderation |
Date: | 2009-06-09 10:02:09 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10906090302v490b81dckee9b8e579446bd1b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Josh Berkus<josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> I'd be up for broadening the approval pool, though, by approaching people we
> *do* know who aren't on -www right now. It would be also useful to have a
> nag reminder: the webadmin system could send a reminder to this list
> whenever we had unapproved/unrejected items more than 3 days old.
Yeah, that seems to be the one thing we're missing that is in the
workflow that Guillaume described. I'll bung it on my todo.
> Of course, I'm hoping with a new WWW backend, it will get easier to approve
> stuff and such measures won't be necessary.
Huh? It's not exactly hard now. Open the item, check it, click the
approved checkbox and hit submit/save. It's not likely to get any
easier, without removing the need to open it - and you can't properly
moderate anything you didn't write yourself without opening it and
reading it anyway.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-06-09 10:19:44 | Re: News moderation |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-06-09 09:58:33 | Re: News moderation |