From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Pg Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Perl 5.10 vs. PG 8.4 on Win32 |
Date: | 2009-05-16 18:37:20 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10905161137r6e235f5bk9a851b68ebecfae4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> Ooh, sneaky. I like it. Not sure it helps much though:
>
>> postgres.exe!atexit_callback() Line 228 C
>> msvcr80.dll!doexit(int code=0, int quick=0, int retcaller=1) Line 553 C
>> msvcr80.dll!_cexit() Line 413 + 0xb bytes C
>> msvcr80.dll!__CRTDLL_INIT(void * hDllHandle=0x78130000, unsigned
>> long dwReason=0, void * lpreserved=0x00000001) Line 389 C
>> msvcr80.dll!_CRTDLL_INIT(void * hDllHandle=0x78130000, unsigned long
>> dwReason=0, void * lpreserved=0x00000001) Line 214 + 0x11 bytes C
>> ntdll.dll!7c90118a()
>> [Frames below may be incorrect and/or missing, no symbols loaded for
>> ntdll.dll]
>> ntdll.dll!7c923ada()
>> ntdll.dll!7c910435()
>> ntdll.dll!7c91043e()
>> ntdll.dll!7c923c88()
>> kernel32.dll!7c81caae()
>> postgres.exe!main(int argc=3, char * * argv=0x00262fc0) Line 165 +
>> 0x7 bytes C
>> postgres.exe!__tmainCRTStartup() Line 597 + 0x17 bytes C
>
> I think you must've traced the wrong process --- this looks like an exit
> from main(). There should be a pile of stack frames for Postgres
> functions if we are inside a call from plperl.c to the Perl dll.
Well, I added a dummy callback to plperl.c, and added the hook it in
the plperl.c init function. The dummy callback simply slept for 60
seconds to let me attach the debugger. I attached and broke to confirm
I was where I expected. I then stepped out of my dummy callback (which
was below DLLMain in it's backtrace btw) and let it run to a
breakpoint in the real atexit_callback, which is where this backtrace
is from. As far as I can tell, it is from the right process, as only
the correct one should have added the foo_callback hook.
BTW, I'm currently attempting to build perl myself so I can get a more
helpful backtrace. Strawberry perl exhibits the same crash and doesn't
come with symbols either.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-05-16 18:49:57 | Re: Perl 5.10 vs. PG 8.4 on Win32 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-16 18:28:46 | Re: Perl 5.10 vs. PG 8.4 on Win32 |