From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: windows shared memory error |
Date: | 2009-05-01 15:11:52 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10905010811k4a58d4cvd75fd2d73bd1c6b4@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It strikes me that we really need to try reconnecting to the shared
>>> memory
>>> here several times, and maybe the backoff need to increase each time. On
>>> a
>>> loaded server this cause postgres to fail to restart fairly reliably.
>>
>> At the risk of sounding predictable, +1. Maybe try 5 times, repeating
>> at 1, 2, 4 & 8 seconds? Any longer seems like it will be a genuine
>> failure (so does 8 seconds in fact, but I don't suppose it'll hurt to
>> try).
>
> 1+2+4+8 = 15 seconds
Err, yes. What's your point?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-01 15:23:24 | Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-05-01 15:10:11 | Re: windows shared memory error |