From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3.7 Windows Update Error |
Date: | 2009-03-25 20:13:55 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10903251313k39559364r3cd3a856834cced6@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Richard Broersma
<richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>
>>> Q2) Is integer timestamps becoming the new default from the previous
>>> floating point data type?
>>
>> My guess is that your previous install was from the community MSI
>> installer, and not the one-click one. Could that be it?
>
> Thanks guys!
>
> Yes this is correct. I am now downloading the community version. I
> am curious why the community version isn't the first choice listed in
> the PostgreSQL download page. (Not that it really matters which
> version is listed first.)
They're both packaged by exactly the same community member. The
one-click installer is listed first because it's easier to use and
shields the user from many of the more advanced features in the MSI
installer that some people find confusing.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2009-03-25 20:19:39 | Re: text column constraint, newbie question |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2009-03-25 20:12:25 | Re: [SQL] Can we load all database objects in memory? |