From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SVN Commit by dpage: r7607 - trunk/pgadmin3/pgadmin/ui |
Date: | 2009-03-11 09:45:30 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10903110245s73cd5578v41951b5587fd8316@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> Will they get back to their original height before beta1? because 280 is
>> way too small on GTK. On many dialogs, I can hide some components
>> (comments' textbox and "use replication" checkbox, but also table's
>> properties with the autovacuum's tab, privileges'tab for a view and
>> sequence, definition's view on an external type) because the dialog's
>> minimum height is too small.
>>
>
> The problem was that the dialogues were so tall on GTK that even with
> a 1024x768 display, the ok/cancel buttons cannot be seen. Our QA guys
> tell me it's ok now - they test on a bunch of distros.
>
> Have you cleared out any old settings?
FYI, I just tested SVN trunk on CentOS 5.2, running the default Gnome
config, having first removed my .pgadmin3 file. The resized dialogues
all look fine, and fit nicely onto a 1024x768 display. We could
probably make things fit onto 800x600 with some effort - the gaps
between controls are a little on the large size on GTK.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-03-11 09:58:57 | Re: SVN Commit by dpage: r7607 - trunk/pgadmin3/pgadmin/ui |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-03-11 09:20:56 | Re: 1.10 beta 1 |