Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules)
Date: 2009-02-26 08:47:25
Message-ID: 937d27e10902260047g6852e32dpbc078eecb74dd133@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> I think his reply states that. The long and short is, what Tom was
> concerned about is true and Heikki has confirmed it. This patch as nice
> as it would be to have, isn't ready for prime time. It is time to push
> this patch to 8.5, close up the rest of whatever is left with other
> patches and move to Beta.

The decision on whether it is ready lies with Heikki, and whilst he is
prepared to work on it, and there are other patches still in the queue
being worked on by other committers there is no reason to bump it yet
(unless Heikki wants to look at the other patches).

I agree that this patch alone should not delay the release further though.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Harald Armin Massa 2009-02-26 09:14:55 Re: effective_cache_size less than shared_buffers
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-02-26 08:30:25 Re: Hot standby, recovery procs