From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4... |
Date: | 2009-02-25 16:47:58 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10902250847j265b2ba4qc2905fb89c6f661d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-general |
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> wrote:
>>> What? Hot standby won't make it in 8.4?
>>
>> Hot standby != synch-rep.
>>
>> The former is still being reviewed, though it's starting to look like
>> it's cutting it pretty fine for inclusion in 8.4.
>>
>
> If you think Hot Standby will be in 8.4, we need to work on a UI that
> uses the recovery control functions (as described on
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Hot_Standby#Dynamic_Control_of_Recovery)
>
> If no-one already works on that, I would love to do it.
We're not going to get that done for 1.10. We freeze on Friday don't forget.
No reason we can't have a short 1.11 cycle though.... I'll probably
have some new features early in the new cycle too.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-02-25 17:11:17 | Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4... |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-02-25 16:45:17 | Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Roderick A. Anderson | 2009-02-25 16:50:15 | Valid characters for user/role/group names? |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2009-02-25 16:45:17 | Re: [GENERAL] speaking of 8.4... |