Re: pg_upgrade project status

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade project status
Date: 2009-01-27 14:44:29
Message-ID: 937d27e10901270644mce46bd2u8caed1ce92c0d71c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> I think it's fairly easy to install Perl on Windows actually. It
> doesn't sound too onerous a requirement if you want in-place upgrade;
> actually it looks a very reasonable one.

There are installers for it, but given that we made a point of porting
everything to C to avoid using any scripting languages on end-user
machines when we ported to Windows, it seems strange to relax that
'policy' now for convenience.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kenneth Marshall 2009-01-27 14:44:37 Re: pg_upgrade project status
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-01-27 14:39:50 Re: pg_upgrade project status