From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Eduardo Arévalo <earevaloch(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: failed to install posgrest |
Date: | 2008-10-04 08:14:20 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10810040114l4c4f0523x4a87e7e2d1680e0b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Easy Dave. I was simply trying to figure out where the .bin came from,
> which in turn came with a recommendation which I stand by that no one
> should be using anything but operating supported packages (in this
> case RPM, and assuming the package is available).
Which, not all of it is, at least not from any source I'm aware of.
> I think it is also important to make a distinction that it is not
> a .Org distributed file, so "if" there is a problem we can point the
> user in the right direction to get help. Which may or may not be on
> this list.
Whether or not it's '.Org distributed' is irrelevant - I doubt you
could help with a win32 installation problem for example. What is
relevant, is the origin of the package, regardless of whether it came
from the PostgreSQL ftp site.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-10-04 08:17:41 | Re: failed to install posgrest |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-10-04 07:02:59 | Re: Standalone Windows Installation |