Re: Finding some bug statistics..

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Chander Ganesan" <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL WWW" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Finding some bug statistics..
Date: 2008-09-30 15:28:23
Message-ID: 937d27e10809300828n27207575m8b7af574bcacbe0d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Chander Ganesan <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Ahh..I saw Josh Berkus's post here:
>> http://www.murrayc.com/blog/permalink/2008/04/25/postgresql-has-no-bugzilla/
>>
>> Is it safe to say that 72 hours is pretty standard?
>>
>
> Less usually. However some bug require more thought and planning, so
> occasionally there will be ones that can take longer to figure out and
> understand. They are often complex security issues.

I should also add, that thats one of the key reasons why we don't have
a tracker - the bugs are so few and usually fixed quickly that we
don't need to track them.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-09-30 15:47:13 Re: Finding some bug statistics..
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-09-30 15:26:53 Re: Finding some bug statistics..