From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Download strategy |
Date: | 2008-09-19 07:23:06 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10809190023s2bafb89aib97da69433febf16@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Robert Treat
<xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
> huh? i'm not talking about the one-click installer, I'm talking about
> pgsqlrpms vs rhel rpms.
Sorry - getting late; I misread what you wrote.
>> > and I'm not
>> > sure we should be promoting what is essentially a 3rd party system over
>> > the vendor supplied rpms.
>>
>> Vendor supplied RPMs are not released in the timely fashion that
>> Devrim's are, nor do they have such a wide range of PostgreSQL
>> packages as far as I'm aware.
>
> Is that a reason to ignore the vendor? Remember for people using something
> like RHEL, using pgdg rpms might be in violation of the support terms.
We're not ignoring the vendor - it's just that no one wrote the text
for that particular vendor yet. I did ask here a couple of times for
people to help populate the list with alternative distributions (and
to improve the text for the existing ones); you're welcome to provide
a patch :-p
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chander Ganesan | 2008-09-19 17:25:39 | Re: Download strategy |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-09-18 21:23:39 | Re: Download strategy |