From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Download strategy |
Date: | 2008-09-18 19:45:38 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10809181245w741eadfamb8601225a4885431@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Robert Treat
<xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
> You know, I find it arguable that it is "easier" to use the "postgresql" yum
> repository rather than the built in stuff in centos/rhel/fedora,
It's not that it's necessarily easier than running 'yum install xxx',
it's that it's easier than figuring that you need postgresql,
postgresql-devel, postgresql-docs, postgresql-libs, pgadmin3,
pljava....
A one-click package is also what the majority of people coming from a
commercial background are likely to be used to.
> and I'm not
> sure we should be promoting what is essentially a 3rd party system over the
> vendor supplied rpms.
Vendor supplied RPMs are not released in the timely fashion that
Devrim's are, nor do they have such a wide range of PostgreSQL
packages as far as I'm aware.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-09-18 19:49:10 | Re: Download links |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-09-18 19:36:34 | Re: Download strategy |