| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: request for sponsors page |
| Date: | 2008-08-21 19:23:46 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10808211223w611eb4d7j4e13319193166070@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hah - from the man that argued against over-engineering techdocs a few
>> years back, that's funny. We don't need software to manage what is
>> currently less than a couple of dozen sponsors. A spreadsheet listing
>> them, review date and qualifying criteria which is periodically
>> re-assessed will be more than adequate.
>
> Actually, there are quite a few more than that. Dozens to hundreds
> depending on whom we include. You're only thinking about the handful of
> large corporate donors, and not the scores of individual givers and in-kind
> donors.
No, I'm not because if you think we should start tracking and listing
everyone that gives us five bucks then you clearly need to come in out
of the sun for a while :-).
We're talking about managing a single page of major sponsors on our
website. It's not rocket science, doesn't need specialist software and
should be a relatively trivial task.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-08-21 19:25:36 | Re: request for sponsors page |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-21 19:04:33 | Re: [FINALLY] the TODO list has migrated to Wiki |