Re: request for sponsors page

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: "Joshua Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: request for sponsors page
Date: 2008-08-21 07:28:15
Message-ID: 937d27e10808210028n419f2586w8316976a826d3815@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Dave,
>
>> My thoughts exactly. Weren't you drafting a policy for sponsor
>> recognition at one point?
>
> Yes, but:
>
> a) we don't have technology to track sponsors right now (working on it),
> and

Hah - from the man that argued against over-engineering techdocs a few
years back, that's funny. We don't need software to manage what is
currently less than a couple of dozen sponsors. A spreadsheet listing
them, review date and qualifying criteria which is periodically
re-assessed will be more than adequate.

> b) JD argued with me so much I got tired of discussing it.

Which is why I suggested to him that we restart the discussion with
some new blood to break the deadlock. If we cannot reach a consensus,
then it'll have to be a majority or we'll never move forward.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2008-08-21 09:47:21 Re: request for sponsors page
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2008-08-21 05:47:34 Re: Wiki accounts linked to community account?