From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Mickael Deloison" <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgScript patch based on pgScript-1.0-beta-3 |
Date: | 2008-08-14 07:24:31 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10808140024m409af89aj6300adbe46a96275@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Mickael Deloison <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a new patch for pgAdmin that includes pgScript. Maybe the
> crashes Dave and Guillaume got were caused by a simultaneous access to
> the output stream, which is now solved.
>
> This patch is based on r7403:
> * r7403-dif-pgs1.0b3.zip for the source code patch
> * r7403-bin-pgs1.0b3.zip for the Windows binary
> Everything is here: http://pgscript.projects.postgresql.org/pgadmin/
OK - I'll try to test this week but I'm pretty busy right now.
> Please let me know your choice about how to integrate pgScript into
> pgAdmin (DLL, ...)?
Well a lot of the argument around separating it was based on the idea
that you would continue to work on it without being bound by the
pgAdmin release cycle. I think that makes you one of major the
decision makers - so what do you think we should do?
FWIW, I don't have any major objection to any of the integration
methods, though having it as a completely separate executable is
probably my least favourite option.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mickael Deloison | 2008-08-14 13:26:45 | Re: pgScript patch based on pgScript-1.0-beta-3 |
Previous Message | Erikjan Rijkers | 2008-08-14 01:31:23 | Re: pgScript patch based on pgScript-1.0-beta-3 |