From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Jean-Paul Argudo" <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Koen Martens" <gmc(at)sonologic(dot)nl>, "PostgreSQL EU General" <pgsql-eu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Presenting groups |
Date: | 2008-07-17 13:58:52 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10807170658t6dfe99e5t198809ccb604286f@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgeu-general |
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Jean-Paul Argudo
<jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org> wrote:
> Everyone is indeed free to participate, I just suggested small groups as
> an opposition to this mailing-list, pgsql-eu-general.
That makes perfect sense of course.
> I also think there won't be more that 2-6 persons working on each group
> at a same time, since I'm part of a national PUG for some years, I know
> how those things works.
Maybe, maybe not. Many of the groups on the main project are larger
(funds, advocacy, www). As we grow in Europe, so will the groups.
> Maybe the Sponsorship and Institutions, or Accounting may keep things a
> bit more private, between the board of directors or some other trusted
> people? I don't know why exactly yet but I see some points already.
Oh, absolutely. That's why groups like -core and -sysadmins are closed.
> So far, how many people participated in this thread? :-/
Ahh, well - you just need a snappier subject line. Try something like:
FREE BEER!!!!!! (and Presenting Groups)
:-p
>> I agree with having people act as leaders in each area. They need to
>> be decision makers, and be able to lead discussions which go off
>> track.
>
> Ok. So, as an artificial conclusion, I think we agree on yet everything. :-)
Pretty much :-)
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Koen Martens | 2008-07-17 14:07:40 | Re: Presenting groups |
Previous Message | Jean-Paul Argudo | 2008-07-17 13:46:39 | Re: Presenting groups |