| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: stat() vs cygwin |
| Date: | 2008-06-24 08:47:00 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10806240147v7e0c9f4fje8ca0a29b3a12646@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Yes.
>
> As in the cygwin build does build. Nobody really has verified if the fix
> is needed there. But frankly, if you are likely to care about the
> effects of this issue, you won't be running cygwin anyway. It's mostly a
> dead platform for postgresql anyway, AFAICS we only keep it building for
> legacy compatibility. Once it starts taking lots of resources to keep
> building (which it doesn't now), I think we should just drop it instead...
FWIW, the most recent packages from Cygwin themselves are 8.2.5.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-06-24 12:21:48 | Re: Dept of ugly hacks: eliminating padding space in system indexes |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-06-24 08:32:08 | Re: stat() vs cygwin |