From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Guillaume Lelarge" <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A fix and a new functionnality for the colour patch |
Date: | 2008-06-14 16:43:56 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10806140943u761b8cddhdd4507d54fb5a51a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The colour patch commited by Dave during pgCon2008 allows a user to add a
> background color to the treeview for each specific registered server.
>
> When a user deletes the colour in the server's property, pgAdmin will use a
> black (#000000) background. The treeview node's text will be unreadable.
> What the patch does is impliying white colour when the user doesn't spécify
> a colour.
Hmm, thought I covered that cased. Thanks for catching.
> The new functionality adds a colour button that opens the standard colour
> dialog. The user doesn't new to know the HTML colour coding.
Is the colour dialog available on all platforms? I did look for one
when writing the original patch but couldn't find it. It's possible I
was hungover from the Jagermeister the night before though (EDB party
at pgCon :-) ).
> Comments?
You spelt colour wrong :-). Other than that (and the possible issue
above), looks good.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2008-06-14 16:53:55 | Re: A fix and a new functionnality for the colour patch |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2008-06-14 15:21:24 | A fix and a new functionnality for the colour patch |