Re: New software catalog fails (why are we spelling it "catalogue"?)

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New software catalog fails (why are we spelling it "catalogue"?)
Date: 2008-06-11 18:52:10
Message-ID: 937d27e10806111152r1ee715f4o6c0bef6518e4d6c1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 19:41 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I think we should do it in swahili.
>>
>> Which would make it pg_?????
>>
>
> I couldn't find the swahili so I divert to Russian!
>
> каталогизировать

Hmm - is pg_каталогизировать valid? Or does the prefix change the
meaning in some way?

We have to get these things right y'know...

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-06-11 18:55:41 Re: New software catalog fails (why are we spelling it "catalogue"?)
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-06-11 18:50:54 Re: New software catalog fails (why are we spelling it "catalogue"?)