Re: 1.8.4 bug DB Restriction field

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:

>>> Dave, what do you think I should do ? remove the patch ?
>>
>> Just remove the NOT?
>>
>
> I can do this. But, for example, if someone was using this filter field to
> get out template databases, removing the NOT won't fix this.

Hmm, good point. The original intent behind the feature was for
teaching environments in which there may be one database for each
student, so the students could limit their list to just their own
database without seeing all their schoolmates as well. I think that's
probably the most important case to fix (which removing the NOT should
do), as those people will likely have *lot's* of clutter otherwise.

Alternatively, you could make the NOT optional with a checkbox.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com