| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] National community sites @ postgresql.org? |
| Date: | 2008-05-08 15:03:23 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10805080803m479858b3p5e0cbe84503a1888@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
> > So how do you decide who gets to run the PUG site?
>
> We aren't talking about PUGs here, or at least that wasn't my impression ... we
> were talking about community sites, under which several pugs could exist ...
There is a very blurred line between PUG and community 'group' in my
experience. Given there are two 'groups' in Italy, how would we decide
which was in control of the it.postgresql.org community site?
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2008-05-10 06:57:49 | Re: Greece: 3rd Open Source Software Conference. |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-05-08 14:52:03 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] National community sites @ postgresql.org? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-05-08 15:29:21 | Re: IM |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-05-08 14:52:03 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] National community sites @ postgresql.org? |