Re: postgre vs MySQL

On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:07 PM, David Wall <d(dot)wall(at)computer(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > I imagine you can get round the second one by building your software
> > so it supports PostgreSQL as well - that way you don't 'require
> > customes to install MySQL'.
> >
> Well, I'm not sure how they'd even know you were doing this, but as a
> commercial company, I'd suggest you not follow that advice since the
> code would not work without install MySQL. Yes, they could install PG
> instead, and if they did, MySQL would have no problem. But if you use
> MySQL, then clearly it's required and a commercial license would be
> required (though perhaps at least you'd put the legal obligation on the
> end customer).

Huh? I'm suggesting that you write your code to be
database-independent such that it is the user's choice what DBMS he
uses. That way you aren't 'requiring them to install MySQL'. MySQL
cannot hold you liable if a customer chooses to use your closed source
Java/JDBC app with their DBMS if you didn't require it.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk