Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Stefan Schwarzer" <stefan(dot)schwarzer(at)grid(dot)unep(dot)ch>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine
Date: 2008-01-18 16:31:15
Message-ID: 937d27e10801180831i66ac4724o91d681e15bedac8c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches

On 18/01/2008, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Hm? integer_datetimes is encoded separately and there's a very specific
> error message if it's wrong. The case I think you are remembering was
> caused by a width-of-time_t discrepancy, which should be fixed but it's
> got nothing to do with anything else.

Yeah, I think you're probably right there.

> Zero cost and also zero benefit. The missing piece of information here
> was that the executable being used was running under PPC emulation, and
> I'll bet money that there would have been nothing in either uname or
> pg_config output that would have told us that.

I'd wager there would be a fairly good chance that a PPC-only binary
on a Mac would most likely have been built on a PPC, and thus mention
that in the uname output at build time. I can't imagine many folks are
building PPC-only binaries on Intels.

How much money did you have in mind? :-)

/D

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Wilson 2008-01-18 16:34:07 Re: Replication Using Triggers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-18 16:18:32 Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2008-01-18 16:37:32 Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-18 16:18:32 Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine