From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Stefan Schwarzer" <stefan(dot)schwarzer(at)grid(dot)unep(dot)ch>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine |
Date: | 2008-01-18 16:31:15 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10801180831i66ac4724o91d681e15bedac8c@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
On 18/01/2008, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Hm? integer_datetimes is encoded separately and there's a very specific
> error message if it's wrong. The case I think you are remembering was
> caused by a width-of-time_t discrepancy, which should be fixed but it's
> got nothing to do with anything else.
Yeah, I think you're probably right there.
> Zero cost and also zero benefit. The missing piece of information here
> was that the executable being used was running under PPC emulation, and
> I'll bet money that there would have been nothing in either uname or
> pg_config output that would have told us that.
I'd wager there would be a fairly good chance that a PPC-only binary
on a Mac would most likely have been built on a PPC, and thus mention
that in the uname output at build time. I can't imagine many folks are
building PPC-only binaries on Intels.
How much money did you have in mind? :-)
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Wilson | 2008-01-18 16:34:07 | Re: Replication Using Triggers |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-18 16:18:32 | Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-01-18 16:37:32 | Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-18 16:18:32 | Re: Forgot to dump old data before re-installing machine |