Re: not exactly a bug report, but surprising behaviour

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: not exactly a bug report, but surprising behaviour
Date: 2003-02-06 05:05:01
Message-ID: 9377.1044507901@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> But I think this result is deceptive. It's still only 17% of the time. There
> doesn't seem to be a way to get the linux gprof to display the total time per
> function including children.

Er ... did you look all the way through the output? The standard gprof
output shows the flat timings you quoted followed by a call-tree report.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-02-06 05:24:31 Re: How do I create an array?
Previous Message Greg Stark 2003-02-06 04:55:50 How do I create an array?