Re: Improving isolationtester's data output

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Improving isolationtester's data output
Date: 2021-06-17 03:34:57
Message-ID: 937604.1623900897@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> Nobody has complained about the removal of --dry-run with 13~. The
> second one would cause tests to fail after a minor upgrade for
> extensions using isolationtester, but it seems like a good thing to
> inform people about anyway. So, okay, both parts are done.

Thanks!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo NAGATA 2021-06-17 03:55:56 Re: pgbench bug candidate: negative "initial connection time"
Previous Message Yugo NAGATA 2021-06-17 03:23:42 Re: pgbench logging broken by time logic changes