Re: Performance Improvement for Unique Indexes

From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement for Unique Indexes
Date: 2010-03-24 12:18:11
Message-ID: 9362e74e1003240518g3a681545ifaf8644c86f0197c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>
> How are you going to unmark the hint bit in case of a rollback?
>
>
Only after you find that the transaction is committed, this hint bit has to
be set. It is equivalent to any other hint bit.

Gokul.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-03-24 12:31:06 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-03-24 11:52:10 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add connection messages for streaming replication.