From: | "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Andreas Joseph Krogh" <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Including Snapshot Info with Indexes |
Date: | 2007-10-12 15:16:29 |
Message-ID: | 9362e74e0710120816p243168f0y4ab112967b10cf46@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
I agree with that. I will go ahead and do a test implementation and share
the results with everyone.
Thanks,
Gokul.
On 10/12/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no> writes:
> > Will $SUBJECT make it possible for count(*) to use index? This is a much
> > wanted feature.
>
> If you mean "count(*) will become instantaneous", no it won't. It would
> get faster, but probably not by more than a factor of 10 or so,
> corresponding to the size ratio between index and table. Remember that
> the proposal is going to bloat indexes pretty badly: a simple index on
> an int4 column will double in size, more or less. So that ratio will
> be much less favorable than it is today.
>
> Personally I think the bloat problem will doom this entire approach.
> The distributed costs of that will outweigh the speedups that can be
> achieved for specific queries. The OP is free to try to prove this
> fear wrong, but no amount of discussion will constitute such a proof;
> only a testable implementation.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-10-12 15:19:40 | Re: Locales and Encodings |
Previous Message | Florian G. Pflug | 2007-10-12 15:16:14 | Re: pg_restore oddity? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-10-12 19:28:39 | Re: [HACKERS] quote_literal with NULL |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-10-12 14:45:58 | Re: Including Snapshot Info with Indexes |