From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Bgwriter behavior |
Date: | 2005-01-03 20:29:36 |
Message-ID: | 9354.1104784176@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, we have a submitted patch that attempts to improve bgwriter by
> making bgwriter_percent control what percentage of the buffer is
> scanned.
> The patch still needs doc changes and a change to the default value but
> at this point we need a vote on the patch. Is it:
> * too late for 8.0
> * not the right improvement
> * to be applied with doc/default additions
My vote: too late for 8.0. There is no hard evidence that this is a
useful improvement, and no time for such evidence to be obtained.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-01-03 20:32:28 | possible bug in case comparison on index scan. |
Previous Message | Tzahi Fadida | 2005-01-03 20:20:33 | Implementing and Experimenting with a Full Disjunctions Operator. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2005-01-03 20:52:00 | ipcrm or ipcclean hint |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-01-03 20:09:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Bgwriter behavior |