| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Barry Brown <barry(at)cs(dot)sierracollege(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Separating function privileges from tables |
| Date: | 2007-05-04 02:31:36 |
| Message-ID: | 9323.1178245896@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Barry Brown <barry(at)cs(dot)sierracollege(dot)edu> writes:
> It's nice that privileges on views are separate from the privileges
> on its underlying tables. For example, if view V queries tables A and
> B, I only need to grant SELECT on the view to another user; tables A
> and B can have that privilege revoked and the view works.
> Are there plans to extend similar behavior to functions? That is, can
> I simply grant EXECUTE on the function and not have to worry about
> granting the appropriate privileges to the tables used by the function?
I think you are looking for SECURITY DEFINER function option.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Frysinger | 2007-05-04 02:39:47 | Re: cant get pg_dump/pg_restore to behave |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-04 02:30:12 | Re: Dangers of fsync = off |