| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Janning Vygen <vygen(at)gmx(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: doc typo sql-reindex.html psql vs. postgres |
| Date: | 2005-10-20 14:04:26 |
| Message-ID: | 9316.1129817066@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Janning Vygen <vygen(at)gmx(dot)de> writes:
> At
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/sql-reindex.html
> it says:
> Rebuild all system indexes in a particular database,
> without trusting them to be valid already:
> $ export PGOPTIONS="-P"
> $ psql broken_db
> It should be:
> Rebuild all system indexes in a particular database,
> without trusting them to be valid already:
> $ export PGOPTIONS="-P"
> $ postgres broken_db
> ^^^^^^^^
> ,shouldn't it?
No, it's correct as it stands. You used to need a standalone backend
for that, but not anymore. (PGOPTIONS isn't recognized by a standalone
backend anyway, IIRC, so there would be more wrong with the example than
that if it were wrong.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-20 14:09:18 | Re: NULL != text ? |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-10-20 14:01:29 | Re: NEW in Rule makes another nextval call? |