| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Version Numbering |
| Date: | 2010-08-21 14:39:10 |
| Message-ID: | 9302914C-86E3-401E-A890-37E4DBCEA14E@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Aug 21, 2010, at 1:45 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> hmm FWIW I would interpret something like 9.0.1B4 as the forth beta
> release for the first point release of the major release 9.0 bis seems
> stupid and is not anything we have done before.
It does't make sense for PostgreSQL, no.
> You could argue that 9.0.0B4 is the foourth beta for the first
> production release of 9.0 but I find the current naming much more
> reasonable...
Yeah, it's just semantics, really.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-21 15:20:19 | Re: security hook on authorization |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-08-21 11:07:07 | Re: Vaccum and analyze counters in pgstat |