| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Date: | 2017-01-19 11:23:55 |
| Message-ID: | 92fe2a71-5eb7-ee8d-53ef-cfd5a65dfc3d@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/01/19 14:15, Amit Langote wrote:
> So, here are all the patches I posted to date (and one new at the bottom)
> for reported and unreported bugs, excluding the one involving
> BulkInsertState for which you replied in a new thread.
>
> I'll describe the attached patches in brief:
Sorry, I forgot to mention that I have skipped the patch I proposed to
modify the committed approach [1] to get the correct tuple to show in the
constraint violation messages. It might be better to continue that
discussion at [2].
And because I skipped that patch, I should have removed the related logic
in ExecWithCheckOptions() that I added in one of the later patches (patch
0004), which I forgot to do. So, here are all the patches again with the
correct 0004 this time. Sigh.
Thanks,
Amit
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Fix-a-bug-of-insertion-into-an-internal-partition.patch | text/x-diff | 6.7 KB |
| 0002-Set-ecxt_scantuple-correctly-for-tuple-routing.patch | text/x-diff | 4.6 KB |
| 0003-Fix-RETURNING-to-work-correctly-after-tuple-routing.patch | text/x-diff | 9.8 KB |
| 0004-Fix-some-issues-with-views-and-partitioned-tables.patch | text/x-diff | 5.6 KB |
| 0005-Fix-some-wrong-thinking-in-check_new_partition_bound.patch | text/x-diff | 8.0 KB |
| 0006-Avoid-code-duplication-in-map_partition_varattnos.patch | text/x-diff | 1.9 KB |
| 0007-Avoid-tuple-coversion-in-common-partitioning-cases.patch | text/x-diff | 4.9 KB |
| 0008-Avoid-DROP-TABLE-.-CASCADE-in-more-partitioning-test.patch | text/x-diff | 5.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2017-01-19 11:31:54 | Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
| Previous Message | Antonin Houska | 2017-01-19 11:22:25 | Re: PoC: Grouped base relation |