From: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Shankar K <shan0075(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Postgres on Netapp |
Date: | 2004-01-16 16:53:18 |
Message-ID: | 92970000.1074271998@lerlaptop-red.iadfw.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
--On Monday, January 12, 2004 13:45:45 -0800 Shankar K <shan0075(at)yahoo(dot)com>
wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> We are considering to use NetApp filer for a highly
> busy 24*7 postgres database and the reason we chose
> netapp, mostly being the "snapshot" functionality for
> backing up database online. The filer would be mounted
> on a rh linux server (7.3), 4g RAM, dual cpu with a
> dedicated card for filer.
>
> I'd appreciate if anyone could share your experience
> in configuring things on the filer for optimal
> performance or any recomendataion that i should be
> aware of.
I run a (not very busy) PG cluster on a NetAPP.
It seems to do just fine.
The issue is the speed of the network connection. In my case it's only
FastEthernet (100BaseTX). If it's very busy, you may need to look
at GigE.
LER
>
> Thanks,
> Shankar
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manuel Sugawara | 2004-01-16 16:58:54 | Re: problem creating user |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-01-16 15:55:50 | Re: Protect pg_xlog ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rod Taylor | 2004-01-16 17:01:39 | Re: [PERFORM] Postgres on Netapp |
Previous Message | Anjan Dave | 2004-01-16 15:29:38 | Re: shared_buffer value |