From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Missing "Up" navigation link between parts and doc root? |
Date: | 2020-07-03 13:45:31 |
Message-ID: | 929517.1593783931@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2020-06-21 09:19, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> I've been annoyed that the documentation navigation does not always has an
>> "Up" link. It has them inside parts, but the link disappears and you have
>> to go for the "Home" link which is far on the right when on the root page
>> of a part?
>>
>> Is there a good reason not to have the "Up" link there as well?
> The original stylesheets explicitly go out of their way to do it that
> way.
Can we find any evidence of the reasoning? As you say, that clearly was
an intentional choice.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-07-03 13:52:19 | Re: Cleanup - Removed unused function parameter in reorder buffer & parallel vacuum |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2020-07-03 13:13:31 | Re: Parallell hashjoin sometimes ignores temp_tablespaces |