Re: ERROR: found unexpected null value in index

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Manuel Rigger <rigger(dot)manuel(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ERROR: found unexpected null value in index
Date: 2019-07-10 01:08:39
Message-ID: 9288.1562720919@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Manuel Rigger <rigger(dot)manuel(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> CREATE TABLE t0(c0 TEXT);
> INSERT INTO t0(c0) VALUES('b'), ('a');
> ANALYZE t0;
> INSERT INTO t0(c0) VALUES (NULL);
> UPDATE t0 SET c0 = 'a';
> CREATE INDEX i0 ON t0(c0);
> SELECT * FROM t0 WHERE 'baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa' > t0.c0;
> -- unexpected: ERROR: found unexpected null value in index "i0"

Nifty. As before, the way to make this reproducible is to do it with
another open transaction holding a snapshot, so that the NULL entry
has to be reflected in the index. (I'm not sure why the HOT-update
exception doesn't apply here, but apparently it doesn't.) That is,
it's sufficient to set up one session with

begin transaction isolation level serializable;
select * from some_table;

and then run the above script in another session.

The error is coming from the planner's get_actual_variable_range:

/* Shouldn't have got a null, but be careful */
if (isnull[0])
elog(ERROR, "found unexpected null value in index \"%s\"",
RelationGetRelationName(indexRel));

and I think it's entirely within its rights to complain, because it
set up the scan key to reject nulls. In short, somebody seems to
have broken btrees' processing of SK_ISNULL | SK_SEARCHNOTNULL scankeys,
and they broke it in v11, because prior versions don't show this failure.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-07-10 01:30:56 Re: ERROR: found unexpected null value in index
Previous Message Prakash Ramakrishnan 2019-07-10 00:50:44 Re: perl issue