| From: | Filip Rembiałkowski <plk(dot)zuber(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Wishlist of PL/Perl Enhancements for PostgreSQL 8.5 |
| Date: | 2009-10-06 17:41:26 |
| Message-ID: | 92869e660910061041p8bd15oa74a54a8600701d@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
2009/10/6 Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
>
> Are we looking down the wrong end of the telescope here? What if we had
> something more like the "C" binding for functions:
>
> CREATE FUNCTION foo(int,text,int) AS 'MyModule::internal_foo' LANGUAGE
> plperl;
>
>
> If you want inter-function calls you use internal_foo.
>
>
this really would be a great feature for many plperl users.
( I'm not sure how it breaks current PL model in postgres)
--
Filip Rembiałkowski
JID,mailto:filip(dot)rembialkowski(at)gmail(dot)com
http://filip.rembialkowski.net/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alban Hertroys | 2009-10-06 17:48:16 | Re: is it possible to do an update with a nested select that references the outer update ? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-10-06 17:36:14 | Re: attempted to lock invisible tuple - PG 8.4.1 |