From: | Filip Rembiałkowski <plk(dot)zuber(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PREPARE query with IN? |
Date: | 2009-08-05 23:04:23 |
Message-ID: | 92869e660908051604l1bb238d6sd7d1af7b35fef8ee@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
filip(at)filip=# prepare sth(int[]) as select * from ids where id = ANY($1);
PREPARE
filip(at)filip=# execute sth('{1,2,3}');
id | t
----+-------
1 | eenie
2 | menie
3 | moe
(3 rows)
2009/8/6 Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org>
> Is it possible to prepare a query with the IN clause in a meaningful
> way? I could probably do it with a hard-coded number of arguments, like
> "SELECT x FROM t WHERE y IN ($1, $2, $3)" but that kind of misses the
> point of using IN for my needs.
>
> In any case, it would probably be a good idea to add a sentence about it
> on http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/sql-prepare.html since
> I'm probably not the first one to ask about it :)
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
--
Filip Rembiałkowski
JID,mailto:filip(dot)rembialkowski(at)gmail(dot)com
http://filip.rembialkowski.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-05 23:10:37 | Re: explicit JOIN faster than implicit? |
Previous Message | Christine Desmuke | 2009-08-05 23:03:36 | Re: Make check fails on 8.3.7 |