Re: Fwd: sql_type tinterval not supported by DBD::Pg

From: Filip Rembiałkowski <plk(dot)zuber(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: sql_type tinterval not supported by DBD::Pg
Date: 2008-05-23 09:58:59
Message-ID: 92869e660805230258q542377e6ge12d75a317b90007@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2008/5/22 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:

> "=?UTF-8?Q?Filip_Rembia=C5=82kowski?=" <plk(dot)zuber(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Cannot bind 6, sql_type tinterval not supported by DBD::Pg
>
> > what can this mean?
>
> It means tinterval is not supported by DBD::Pg.
>
> Since tinterval is a nonstandard, deprecated type that will be removed
> someday, I doubt that DBD::Pg should spend any effort on adding support
> for it. You'd be best advised not to use it in your applications.
>

the same with interval type:

...
calling bind_param( 6, '14 days', { 'pg_type' => 1186 } )
Cannot bind 6, sql_type interval not supported by DBD::Pg

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Filip Rembiałkowski

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konsta Tiihonen 2008-05-23 10:25:25 Re: F-Secure and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Pierre-Yves Strub 2008-05-23 09:25:22 Re: Fragments in tsearch2 headline