| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |
| Date: | 2008-04-16 15:51:02 |
| Message-ID: | 9262.1208361062@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> No, I meant the earlier patch which you rejected with the flag in MyProc. I
> realize there were other issues but the initial concern was that it wouldn't
> respond promptly because it would wait for CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS.
No, that's not the concern in the least. The concern is that something
could trap the attempted throwing of the error *after*
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS has noticed the signal.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-16 16:32:58 | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-16 15:13:39 | Re: pg_terminate_backend() issues |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2008-04-16 16:06:31 | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-04-16 15:46:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Text <-> C string |