| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Riedel <riedel+(at)CMU(dot)EDU> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit hashjoins |
| Date: | 1999-05-17 14:22:02 |
| Message-ID: | 9261.926950922@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Erik Riedel <riedel+(at)CMU(dot)EDU> writes:
> I actually have not updated my tree since then, so I don't know about
> changes after 25 March. My logs say:
> 630 snapshot from postgresql CVS (25 March 1999)
> 631 fix for 64-bit LONGALIGN (works!)
> I have been using that version since March without problems (well, at
> least no problems with 64-bit ints and hashjoins...).
OK, but I've done some considerable hacking on the hashjoin code since
then. I don't *think* I broke anything ... but ... if you have the
time to pull current sources and check again, it'd be appreciated.
(There have been a lot of other bugs fixed since March, too.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 1999-05-17 14:25:07 | Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 1999-05-17 14:08:45 | Re: [HACKERS] GEQO optimizer (was Re: Backend message type 0x44 arrived while idle) |